Prohibition of Judicial Review of the Substance of Arbitral Awards; Inadmissibility of Annulment of Arbitral Awards on Grounds of a Confl ict with Good Morals (Czech Supreme Court; October 30, 2009)

Judgment 33 Cdo 2675/2007 of the Czech Supreme Court of October 30, 2009:

Laws Taken into Account in This Ruling:

  • Act [CZE] No. 40/1964 Coll., as amended, the Civil Code: Sec. 3 (1)
  • Act [CZE] No. 99/1963 Sb., as amended, the Code of Civil Procedure
  • Act [CZE] No. 216/1994 Sb., as amended, Act on Arbitration and on the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards: Sec. 31
keywords
good morals
nature of arbitration
legal assessment
review of factual correctness
factual correctness
annulment of arbitral award
about the authors

Univ. Professor, Dr.iur., Mgr., Dipl. Ing. oec/MB, Dr.h.c. Lawyer admitted and practising in Prague/CZE (Branch N.J./US), Senior Partner of the Law Offices Bělohlávek, Dept. of Law, Faculty of Economics, Ostrava, CZE, Dept. of Int. and European Law, Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Brno, CZE (visiting), Chairman of the Commission on Arbitration ICC National Committee CZE, Arbitrator in Prague, Vienna, Kiev etc. Member of ASA, DIS, Austrian Arb. Association. The President of the WJA – the World Jurist Association, Washington D.C./USA.

e-mail: office@ablegal.cz